|
"Boys' Weeklies" is an essay by George Orwell in which he analyses those weekly story-paper publications for boys which were current around 1940. After being published in ''Horizon'' in abridged form, it was published alongside two of his other pieces in ''Inside the Whale and Other Essays'' from Victor Gollancz Ltd. The essay deals primarily with the School Stories published in ''The Magnet'' and ''The Gem'' and also with the 'Tuppenny Bloods' published by D.C. Thomson. He suggested that the style of ''The Magnet'' and ''Gem'' was deliberately formulaic so that it could be copied by a panel of authors whom he erroneously supposed to lie behind the author's names. He also denigrated the works as outdated, snobbish and right-wing, . He characterises the mental world of ''The Magnet'' and ''Gem'' as being "1910 - or 1940, but it is all the same... there is a cosy fire in the study... The King is on his throne... Everything will be the same forever." He then addressed what he regarded as more up-to-date papers, DC Thompson's tuppenny bloods. He notes that the stories were shorter and faster paced and tend to be dominated by a single figure. He suggests the working classes are depicted in a stereotyped manner in both types of paper and regrets the absence of any Socialist perspective. Charles Hamilton later published a reply to his comments about ''The Magnet'' and ''Gem'', under the ''Magnet'' pen-name of Frank Richards; this reply included his first public acknowledgement of himself as author of both papers and defended the wholesome nature of the stories as being appropriate for his audience . ==See also== *Bibliography of George Orwell *Story Papers 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Boys' Weeklies」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|